Sure. I'll just answer very quickly here.
I think it ultimately requires alignment, right? I think we can find that alignment in this kind of Venn diagram, where there is going to be an intersection between what's economically advantageous and what's going to be good for the climate. That Venn diagram or that intersection could be different depending on the jurisdiction. I would argue that, in Alberta, it's going to be different from in Nova Scotia and Quebec, and I think we need to recognize that in terms of the type of alignment that the federal government can have with the provinces.
For example, if you have an oil furnace in your home in Nova Scotia, as you well know, if you put in a heat pump, it's a slam dunk; you're going to save money tomorrow. It might not be the same situation if you're heating with natural gas right now in Edmonton. I think we need to recognize that if we're truly going to find these paths that are going to be practical and address the affordability issue. Ultimately, I think that coordination just needs to start with alignment, and then maybe asymmetrical policies in terms of how the federal government interacts with the provinces.