Again, thank you for the question.
I would say one thing we're focused on—and this is why I really emphasized the next five years in my remarks—is that we can do so much today so cost-effectively. I think one of the challenges around conversations about emissions is that we tend to focus on that last 10%, rather than on the 90% that we know how to solve cost-effectively. We have the technologies, and they are ready to go. We just need to scale them.
The focus of our organization's approach is really thinking about how we can amplify the role of electricity in Canadian homes and buildings to benefit Canadian consumers and households. How can we use it to attract industries that will be increasingly competitive in this new electrotech revolution we're seeing across the world?
I think, with the greatest of respect for the question, we know the answer to get to 95%. This is, to me, one of the reasons it's important not just to focus on 2050 or the kinds of end solutions that may be in question 20 years from now. We know the answers for the 90%, and we just need to roll them out.