Thank you for highlighting another one of our submissions that we did not have an opportunity to highlight this morning.
You'll note in our submission that we've actually raised this as an area that perhaps could use a little bit of work, because the way the order in council was drafted it refers to specific activities as opposed to an organization. So an organization in British Columbia that is carrying on activities in British Columbia, as a B.C. credit union would do, is subject to the B.C. privacy legislation and would fall outside the scope of PIPEDA.
The B.C. legislation does say that if something falls under the scope of the federal legislation the B.C. legislation does not apply, so you're not going to have the same legislation apply in the same circumstance. But what's less clear because of the way the order in council was drafted was that the two different pieces of legislation could apply to the same organization in different circumstances.