Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I will return to where I left my question last time, and back to the assistant commissioner. This is a real-time example with fictitious names, and it is a very recent example.
Let's say Dow Jones's spouse got murdered, and Income Trust is a friend of this Dow Jones. An RCMP officer picks up a phone and goes to the white pages of the book. The RCMP officer picks up the phone, calls the Income Trust person, tells Income Trust that they are doing an investigation against Dow Jones, says that a murder has happened, and asks if Income Trust is friends with that person. The way I look at it is this. You said you should not be disclosing it, and that if it's disclosed it can jeopardize the investigation totally. Even though that Income Trust is not the right person, this RCMP officer just went to the white pages, and he was calling every Income Trust listed in the phone book.
The way I look at it is if this Income Trust person who was called by the RCMP goes out and tells Dow Jones that there is an investigation going on, and that they are looking for a person named Income Trust who is a friend with you, I think it is going to jeopardize the whole thing. On one side this could really be the person in that particular murder, but on the other hand if those are innocent, it can jeopardize the integrity of those two people as well.
Would you like to comment on that, under this act?