I'm sorry, you're way beyond your time, Mr. Dhaliwal.
I think what Mr. Dhaliwal was saying is this. It would be if an RCMP officer went to next door neighbours and asked if they happened to know where Tom Wappel was because the officer thinks he committed the murder, as opposed to asking if they happened to know where Mr. Wappel was--the implication being that the guy who's been accused by the investigating officer may perhaps be exonerated later on.
Is that the general drift of what you're talking about?