We've addressed this issue that we are hesitant to recommend that you move to that because the interpretation, perhaps not necessarily by us but it's a direction to the courts as well, could spill over into many areas that we can't foresee at the time and could have an impact on the general issue of worker surveillance, which is a huge issue. Between voice prints, GPSs, biometrics to get in the door, surveillance videos at your work and so on, this is a huge issue for all of us. I would be concerned with the additional direction that it would give me in that context.
On February 22nd, 2007. See this statement in context.