Evidence of meeting #46 for Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics in the 39th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was report.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Michael Jenkin  Co-Chair, Consumer Measures Committee, Department of Industry
David Clarke  Co-Chair, Identity Theft Working Group, Consumer Measures Committee, Department of Industry
Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Richard Rumas
Nancy Holmes  Committee Researcher

11 a.m.

Bloc

Robert Vincent Bloc Shefford, QC

I challenge the Chair's ruling and I request that it be put to a vote. Ask the Clerk to respond.

11 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Tom Wappel

Understand, the ruling of the chair has been contested.

11 a.m.

Bloc

Carole Lavallée Bloc Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert, QC

Yes.

11 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Tom Wappel

Is it the will of the committee to support the ruling of the chair?

11 a.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

Yes.

11 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Tom Wappel

Would you please call the vote, a recorded vote? Quickly. We're running out of time.

(Ruling of the chair overturned [See Minutes of Proceedings])

11 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Tom Wappel

The chair is not sustained. What does that mean? That means we have to have a motion to adjourn. Is this what you're suggesting?

11 a.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

I still have the floor, then, I believe.

11 a.m.

An hon. member

No.

11 a.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

He stopped me in the middle of my conversation to adjourn the meeting.

11 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Tom Wappel

I stopped him in the middle of his sentence because we had reached 11 o'clock.

11 a.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

I still have the floor.

11 a.m.

Bloc

Carole Lavallée Bloc Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert, QC

This is a point of order, now.

11 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Tom Wappel

I ruled the point not well taken. You appealed. The point was taken as well taken. So you have stated that a motion is necessary in order to adjourn the meeting. That's the ruling that the committee apparently seems to think is in order.

But I interrupted Mr. Wallace. Mr. Wallace had the floor.

11 a.m.

Bloc

Carole Lavallée Bloc Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert, QC

Fine.

11 a.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

11 a.m.

Bloc

Carole Lavallée Bloc Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert, QC

Go ahead. We are in debate.

11 a.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

Can I ask a procedural question? Maybe you'll have the answer--whether the committee agrees with you or not.

Since I have the floor, I can move an adjournment. Is that correct?

11 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Tom Wappel

Apparently so.

11 a.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

If it fails, do I still continue to have the floor?

11 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Tom Wappel

As long as there's quorum.

11 a.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

Okay.

I move an adjournment of today's meeting, with the motion that's been presented to us to be the first item on the agenda the next time.

11 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Tom Wappel

There are no conditions. You move the adjournment and--

11 a.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

I move the adjournment. That's my expectation.

11 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Tom Wappel

Is there any debate on the motion?