Maybe I'll just leave this. This might be just a comment from me, and if you see it as a question, then so be it.
What I'm seeing here is that we have the policy oversight obviously taking in information and perhaps making some suggestions on guidelines. We have Justice keeping an eye on things. In terms of an actual independent audit function, that's what this is, but there seems to be a gap, and that is, what happens after this?
We talked a little bit about you talking to people who are in the ATI community, and keeping an eye on the court, obviously, and you need to follow up on those things. But in terms of an audit within the department to make sure their performance is brought up to service levels, I'm going to say that I think there's a gap. And I'm also going to suggest that....
I remember when I was on the Bill C-2 committee with my colleague, Mr. Martin. We said at the beginning, and then we were promised by the government, that we'd have ATI reform.
Maybe I'll put my question to my friend from Justice. Do we have, from the minister, a document on ATI reform?