It's the same type of thing. There's a very interesting statement on page 6 about a legal opinion you received. It was that the part about the public using a parliamentarian to raise a question--which Mr. Peterson asked about--was, according to the legal opinion you received, ultra vires. I don't see any mention of that legal opinion in your remarks. Is that an omission, or have there been further discussions, further legal opinions? Could you bring us up to date?
On September 20th, 2006. See this statement in context.