It's the same type of thing. There's a very interesting statement on page 6 about a legal opinion you received. It was that the part about the public using a parliamentarian to raise a question--which Mr. Peterson asked about--was, according to the legal opinion you received, ultra vires. I don't see any mention of that legal opinion in your remarks. Is that an omission, or have there been further discussions, further legal opinions? Could you bring us up to date?
