Yes. I guess what I'm getting at is that we've always been frustrated with previous ethics commissioners. They never found anything wrong with anything that anybody ever did. It wouldn't matter how many complaints you'd bury them with, there was never anything wrong with anything that any public office holder ever did. Those would be the findings. Maybe that was because of the structure of their office—that they weren't independent. But I'm hoping you'll be able to find the difference between right and wrong. If the public office holder doesn't know it, maybe they could come to you and ask and you'll be able to tell them, because that's been an endless irritation.
I've filed a lot of complaints with ethics commissioners about floor crossers who are offered inducements to cross the floor. I guess that's what I'm getting at with inducements. We need some help in defining the right and wrong associated with.... To offer a member of Parliament some kind of inducement to do something, to do anything, surely violates some code of conduct or the MPs' code. Would that be what those would fall under?