Your question had a number of elements. I would like to break them down.
With respect to things that happened after 9/11 and our correcting them as we move on, we believe that this is part of this correction. I'll try to address the balance of your question.
Ultimately, this is about trying to find a balance. We're in a different world, security-wise, than we were a little while ago. We're in a different world, technology-wise, than we were a while ago. This affects both the common way that individuals communicate and the way that people who want to evade being intercepted communicate. And this in turn affects the investigative tools that law enforcement have at their disposal.
We're not looking at dramatically altering the balance. It's not up to the Privacy Act to determine the proper balance with respect to law enforcement and private laws. This comes under the Charter. We're looking at putting in place a framework that deals with the reality that we're living in an age of identity theft, where the more information that an organization has about somebody, the more safeguards they have to implement to prevent the greater harm of accidental disclosure of that information. So there are protections with respect to that.