Thank you very much.
Mr. Schreiber, I asked you a number of questions the other day. I just want to start, actually, with a quote, and then I'm going to go into my questions. This is dated November 15, 2007, from the Canadian Press, Edward Greenspan--I think you know him. He said, “Everything we have to do, we have to do.” That's an interesting quote.
I asked you the other day, regarding the Airbus purchase, if that was made because it was a good choice for money, if it was a smart purchase, if it was a decision that was made prudently. You responded that it was. The option was, from my understanding, a Boeing 727 jet that was inferior in every way--more fuel, noisier, didn't have the advanced technology in the cockpit. The Airbus was a better plane, and that's why they bought it. That's my understanding. I did some looking into that.
Mr. Martin was asking you to speculate the other day. I didn't like it, and you'll recall that I objected to it, because you can't possibly know. You don't know what I do with my money, and I don't expect to know what other people do with their money either. But he wanted you to answer the question. He asked, “If you can, Mr. Schreiber, would you have any idea who else would have benefited from the distribution of these commissions?”
You said, “Since the money was money from GCI, it's very obvious that the shareholders were entitled, whoever they were, to participate in the money...” and that they have everything. It was very clear.
“Public office-holders?”, asked Mr. Martin.
You said, “I'm speaking about the shareholders, what I know about what GCI did with the money.”
That's interesting.
Now, you allege that back in the late 1990s you were confronted and asked to get GCI money directed to Mr. Mulroney, correct?