I think that we are going to be able to make connections, Mr. Schrieber.
You have just said that all the witnesses in this entire affair must be believed. Personally, I have a hard time believing you. On Tuesday, you told me that the $300,000 paid to former prime minister Brian Mulroney had nothing to do with the Airbus affair. Yet, in the pile of documents that you left us with on Tuesday, there was a letter that you yourself sent to Mr. Mulroney on May 8, 2007 in which you threaten Mr. Mulroney with revealing, amongst other things, that GCI, the Canadian firm that had lobbied for Airbus, had made payments to Mr. Mulroney.
First of all, this is in direct contradiction to what you told me on Tuesday. Second, I cannot believe that you were threatening Mr. Mulroney with saying publicly that you had paid him $300,000 since at least one television program had already done so. It was clear that you had paid him $300,000.
The following words appear at the end of the sentence: "I am prepared to disclose that you received payments from GCI, Frank Moores, Fred Doucet, Gary Ouellet and that I was asked by Fred Doucet to transfer funds to your lawyer in Geneva (Airbus)[...]"
Could you tell us why you wrote "(Airbus)"?