Mr. Chair, it appears that the May 2007 letter is just another item in Mr. Schreiber's desperate campaign to avoid extradition to Germany.
I draw the committee's attention to a letter that Mr. Schreiber wrote on July 20, 2006, where he makes some statements. It's in the Mulroney binder, a letter from Mr. Schreiber to Mr. Mulroney, dated July 20, 2006. The letter makes some statements that completely contradict his letter of May 8, 2007.
I'll quote. It says, “You and I are the innocent victims of this vendetta and you are still the prime target”--referring to Mr. Mulroney.
It goes on to state, “May I state for the record, that my testimony under oath in prior legal proceedings is the only correct description of our business arrangement. You”—referring to Mr. Mulroney—“after returning to private life, at my request, agreed to advise and consult me in certain business affairs.”
Then a little bit later, it says, “There is no “Airbus Affair” involving Brian Mulroney and furthermore there is nothing to hide.”
So, Mr. Chair, my question to Mr. Schreiber and to this committee is about the apparent contradictions between his letter of July 20, 2006, and his letter of May 8, 2007—and in fact also with some pre-existing testimony given before this committee and previous hearings. I draw that to your attention.
I will share the balance of my time with Mr. Van Kesteren.