I think it's laudable, the amendments that have been made and extending the access regime to a whole host of other entities that get public funding and so forth. But even these recommendations do not touch on a wholesale review of the legislation. The purpose of recommendation number one is to ensure that the very good things that have been done here--in the last three years, for example--can be reviewed. Everything can be reviewed. The act can be improved even more so, to the point where it is efficient and it is a model for Canada. I think that's the goal of recommendation number one.
On May 6th, 2009. See this statement in context.