There are many tribunals in Canada that have binding powers over the legislation that they manage, and the recourse to the court is the check and balance, if you will.
But I think in this case it would solve a problem that is really existing under the act right now, because for administrative matters, even though the commissioner can investigate and can render a report, there is no recourse anywhere. So it doesn't solve the delay problem or excess fees being charged, or whatever. It doesn't really allow for those determinations to be made in a final and binding way. Those determinations are a key to some of the complaints about this legislation--delays not being workable, and so forth. So if we have a statute put in place, we should have a reasonable manner in which people can get recourse. And if the commissioner had binding order-making powers, which is very standard across the country in modern access to information statutes, then there will be a mechanism for that to be addressed and perhaps eliminated. And that's the way in which, if they can make a binding order, you must obey, and then institutions will act accordingly.