I don't know of any statute, really, that has that manner of penalty, whether they be fines or whatever. What's involved in recommendation 9 is just allowing departments to have a longer period of time when it's essential, other than the two grounds that exist right now. If the approval of the information for the extension beyond 60 days is required, if you didn't give that approval, then presumably they'd have—whatever—those few more days to actually process the request. That seems to be how it works in most jurisdictions, although there are binding order-making powers, typically.
On May 6th, 2009. See this statement in context.