No. I think you have to look at the numbers.
I'm very familiar with Ontario. I've worked in that system for 20 years, and I can tell you that there are very few judicial reviews relative to the number of decisions the commissioner makes. In Ontario, the commissioner makes about 40 decisions a month. I'd have to say that if one of those is judicially reviewed every month, that would be a lot. It's very rare.
Also, because they are judicial reviews and not appeals, the courts give a lot of deference to the commissioner for his or her expertise, and it's very difficult to be successful on a judicial review. As a matter of recourse, most people get a fairly quick and final decision from the commissioner and then go away. And they usually go away happy--happy in the sense that they got recourse to justice, that they got an adjudication.
I know that the commissioner here is not requesting order-making power across the board. Of course, there are huge resource implications, but he is asking for it in a manner that I think would assist with the backlog, because on those particular matters, there is no recourse to the court in any event.