That's quite a track record.
It's interesting; there are two ways to block access to information. One is to put up a wall. Another method is to create a frustrating maze, at the end of which people just give up. We've seen numbers increase, double. I'm referencing the Privy Council Office and these new mechanisms put in place whereby departments say, “Well, it's in PCO consultations”. Things are dragging out as long as almost a year now, up from the 30 to 60 days that existed previously.
I can't help but think of the TV commercial that we see these days of a little boy with a red truck that's been given to him by a banker. After 30 seconds, time's up and the truck gets taken away, the boy gets a cut-out cardboard truck, and the banker says, “Sorry, read the fine print”. You see the disappointment in the child's face.
There is incredible disappointment; I almost feel that I'm being treated in a similar manner as an elected representative when I try to make these access to information requests.
You've clearly stated that disappointment not only exists among MPs and journalists—people are giving up—but there's a tremendous amount of disappointment in your office. Do you intend to once again follow in Mr. Marleau's footsteps and say, “We need some quick fixes”? Perhaps we've reached a point where we say we need a general overhaul; let's take a look at the open system in New Zealand, where everything immediately gets posted on the Internet.
The minister has basically thrown our report out--work that all of us agreed to, pretty much unanimously, 12 recommendations for quick fixes. It's clear there's no intention on behalf of the minister to address any of this. Ten sessions were spent to work quite meticulously on those recommendations.
Is it time to say, okay, enough of this, let's just overhaul the whole system? We have the opposite of access to information. We have a culture of secrecy.