We're doing a lot of things. First, we're conducting assessments of the impact certain programs have on privacy, in cooperation with the federal institutions. When they introduce a program that can leave room for an invasion of privacy, they conduct an assessment of it.
For example, one of those ongoing assessments received some media coverage. It was the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority pilot project in Kelowna, in which they used what's called the Integrated Checkpoint System, a machine for viewing passengers with the aid of holographic images. That was reported in the press. The Administration got us involved in it from the outset. We haven't issued a decision or judgment, but we're working with the administration's representatives to assess the impact on privacy.
So this is an upstream job to determine in advance whether a proposed program would be consistent with privacy. That's one of our activities.
We're also proceeding with audit activities. Once a program is in place, we determine whether personal information management is adequate. We also do policy development work, research work and public information work.
With respect to technology, I'll give you a recent example. Two weeks ago, we handed out some awards for videos produced by young people in which they had to show how technology can compromise personal information. It was a contest held in Canada's high schools. Projects were submitted, and we awarded prizes for the best ones. That was one way of making youths aware of the dangers of technology.
There are a host of examples, even though I've just given you a few.