Evidence of meeting #16 for Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics in the 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was chair.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

12:40 p.m.

Conservative

Randy Hoback Conservative Prince Albert, SK

I don't have confidence in the chair doing that unilaterally.

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

There you go. That's fine.

Okay, do you want to put the question?

12:40 p.m.

NDP

Bill Siksay NDP Burnaby—Douglas, BC

I move the motion.

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

Okay. Mr. Siksay moves to give the authority to the chair to summon witnesses who have been approved by the committee, if necessary.

We'll call the question.

12:40 p.m.

Conservative

Randy Hoback Conservative Prince Albert, SK

Could we have a recorded vote, Chair?

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

Yes.

We have a tie vote, and the chair votes yes.

(Motion agreed to: yeas 6; nays 5)

Now, on Thursday we have the President of Mexico. The steering committee is going to meet. Hopefully, we'll have a good answer as to what point we will have reached and will know whether or not political staff will be appearing, or their ministers.

We have the problem that a minister can't be compelled to appear, but even if they wish to appear, their calendar may not tie in with ours. So I'm going to be asking the committee, once we find out later on this week, to consider other dates or times for meetings so that we could complete our work before we rise for the summer. So I want members to be considering that.

Now, we've had two items on our agenda that I've been carrying meeting after meeting. I've had a little discussion with the vice-chair, Mr. Siksay, about the Google and Canpages work we did last session. There have been developments. We have a draft report. We had hoped to review the report and go, but Mr. Siksay has a suggestion and maybe a recommendation to make to the committee.

12:45 p.m.

NDP

Bill Siksay NDP Burnaby—Douglas, BC

Thank you, Chair.

Chair, I was very happy with the report that was written and prepared and I was ready to sign off on it until I saw a story in the press—last week, I believe—about some problems that have arisen in Europe, where Google Street View was also recording information about wireless networks when they did the camerawork for their mapping system. A number of European countries have started investigations into that. I believe Google has acknowledged that they screwed up by collecting information that wasn't intended.

It strikes me, Chair, that it would be irresponsible for us to sign off on the report we have before us, given that kind of concern, and I'd like to suggest that we ask both Google and the Privacy Commissioner to come back to explain to us what happened in Europe, and whether similar things happened here in Canada, and what steps Google is taking to protect the privacy of Canadians in this regard.

12:45 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

Okay.

With regard to issuing the report, there is good reason why we shouldn't proceed with issuing it.

Is that acceptable to the members?

12:45 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

12:45 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

So we'll take it off our agenda. The steering committee will consider the recall of Google Street View and the Privacy Commissioner to see whether we might be able to work that in.

The other item on our agenda is the order-in-council appointee rules, and this had to do with.... Rights and Democracy?

Madame?

12:45 p.m.

Bloc

Carole Freeman Bloc Châteauguay—Saint-Constant, QC

I'd like to broach the matter of order-in-council appointments. In 2006, the government promised to set up a commission and appoint a chair to review appointments. However, nothing was ever done. At this time, the appointment process is rather tarnished. Perhaps we need to take a look at this. I know that several attempts have been made to do so in recent years, but I think we need to take a closer look at the way the order-in-council appointment process currently works.

12:45 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

Okay. Would this be as a little study, or an educational...?

12:45 p.m.

Bloc

Carole Freeman Bloc Châteauguay—Saint-Constant, QC

It would be more than that. We should take a closer look at certain appointments, including that of Mr. Latulippe. Would it be okay for the steering committee to decide how best to approach the matter?

12:45 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

Okay, we will certainly consider it. We have to be careful with our mandate. It may be more appropriately the mandate of another committee or whatever. We'll have to look at that carefully, but I understand what you're saying.

I thought we were going to have this appointments commissioner who was going to opine on the whole situation. This has not happened yet. I think that's the big question. Until you have that, it's very difficult to start questioning the individual appointments. That's where we have problems, I think, if we want to go--

12:45 p.m.

Bloc

Carole Freeman Bloc Châteauguay—Saint-Constant, QC

So then, the steering committee can discuss how we are going to proceed?

12:50 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

We certainly can and we will. Thursday, okay.

All right, I have no other business that we had scheduled. I thank you, colleagues, for your patience. It's been a difficult time, but please let's come together and find out how we can continue and complete our work.