My question does not seem to be clear. I do not know whether there is something wrong with simultaneous interpretation, but I will try a third time. I will rephrase it again. The $100,000 you are requesting in the supplementary estimates, and which you have taken from your $20 million budget for anti-spam activities has already been spent. You took it from other areas. So you have a $20 million budget, and you have already used this $100,000. You have cut services somewhere. I would like to know what it is you have eliminated.
Evidence of meeting #2 for Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics in the 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was 100000.
A recording is available from Parliament.