Thank you.
I want to come back to the decision handed down by the Federal Court of Appeal yesterday. On this side of the table, we accept and support the principles of section 68.1 of the Access to Information Act, under which there must be an exclusion for certain subjects. In fact, you are not obliged to make all your information public, particularly when it concerns journalistic work and strategic competitive information that could be of use to your competitors.
However, we do not support your being the party to assess the relevancy of your decision to exclude certain documents. We feel that there should be a third party who decides whether or not you are right in saying that a given document should not be broadcast and made public.
You gave a partial answer to my colleague Mr. Angus earlier on, but would you accept the principle of being assessed by a third party? Would you accept the principle according to which the Information Commissioner would be the person to decide whether you are right or not?