Right now when we open...we do what I call “media monitoring”. We also do further analysis to determine for organizations, for example, where, maybe after a little bit of analysis, we determine maybe they should be sent an advisory letter to let them know that there is an act, and so they can make determinations. We also will open administrative reviews or investigations based on either complaints or what we see in the media.
Those are reactive measures. The idea was to ask how we can be more proactive. For example, can we look at particular sectors of the economy? With the wealth of information that exists in the registry, and looking at the information to compare and contrast, let's say, with companies of a particular sector, are there any patterns? Is there something we want to maybe issue letters about or follow up on, to see if we can get better compliance in terms of disclosure? Or are there emerging issues that might be coming up in terms of policies or programs? Also, are the groups that we are expecting to be registered actually registered?
So it's just being a little bit more proactive and trying to ensure compliance.