Yes. I was rather disappointed with the report.
There were a few things that were accepted, but there were a few things that seemed to be quite problematic, the first one being the public office holder definition, which I've discussed already. What would be envisaged there would be an entirely different system, it seems to me, if that's the route the government decides to take. Of course, if Parliament approves it, anything can be done, but it certainly isn't anything like the office I run.
There were a number of things I had proposed that I thought were fairly important and that didn't get picked up at all, such as the public office holders having some measure of reporting responsibilities. That's as opposed to reporting public office holders. I thought it would be very helpful for people with post-employment rules, particularly the one-year or two-year...whatever you call that—