Evidence of meeting #101 for Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was work.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Zackary Massingham  Chief Executive Officer, AggregateIQ
Jeff Silvester  Chief Operating Officer, AggregateIQ

10:20 a.m.

Chief Executive Officer, AggregateIQ

10:20 a.m.

Liberal

Nathaniel Erskine-Smith Liberal Beaches—East York, ON

Okay.

Thanks very much.

10:20 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Zimmer

Thank you, Mr. Erskine-Smith.

Next up, for five minutes, is Mr. Gourde.

10:20 a.m.

Conservative

Jacques Gourde Conservative Lévis—Lotbinière, QC

I will try to get back to a more positive note.

Are your clients happy with the services you provide?

10:20 a.m.

Chief Operating Officer, AggregateIQ

Jeff Silvester

With respect to the Brexit campaign, I think mostly, yes. Most of our clients are satisfied, but not all of them.

10:20 a.m.

Conservative

Jacques Gourde Conservative Lévis—Lotbinière, QC

People seem to appreciate the speed with which your company provides its services. You are asked to place ads on Facebook, for instance.

Are you involved in developing ads or do you simply receive them and post them on Facebook? Does your team prepare the ads?

10:20 a.m.

Chief Operating Officer, AggregateIQ

Jeff Silvester

Clients will come to us with their vision, their message, and the things they want to talk about. They'll oftentimes have images to go with it. We take their words and try to shrink them down into something that will fit online. The content really comes from the client, and we just help craft that into something that will fit in an online ad.

10:20 a.m.

Conservative

Jacques Gourde Conservative Lévis—Lotbinière, QC

If your client provides an ad that seems to be fake news, do you post it without a critical look, simply because you are paid to do so?

10:20 a.m.

Chief Operating Officer, AggregateIQ

Jeff Silvester

No, and that has not happened in the course of us providing services either.

The information that clients provide to us is typically very well aligned to exactly what they're doing in their campaign, whether it be their vision, their ideas for the future, or the things they care about. These are the sorts of things that clients provide us with typically.

10:20 a.m.

Conservative

Jacques Gourde Conservative Lévis—Lotbinière, QC

In your experience with Brexit, did the companies you dealt with declare the amounts they paid you for the election campaign or was it really outside their election campaign?

10:20 a.m.

Chief Operating Officer, AggregateIQ

Jeff Silvester

Sorry, I don't understand the question. Did they provide the amounts of the spending, or are we talking about the content of the ads?

10:20 a.m.

Conservative

Jacques Gourde Conservative Lévis—Lotbinière, QC

I am talking about the amounts you were paid for the services you provided during the election campaign. You are a Canadian company that provided services in another country, in the United Kingdom. Were the amounts you received during the Brexit election campaign declared in the United Kingdom? In other words, did your clients declare the amounts you were paid for your services or was that omitted?

10:20 a.m.

Chief Operating Officer, AggregateIQ

Jeff Silvester

Yes. All of the information on all of the work we did in the U.K. was publicly reported.

10:20 a.m.

Conservative

Jacques Gourde Conservative Lévis—Lotbinière, QC

Thank you.

I have no further questions.

10:20 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Zimmer

Thank you, Monsieur Gourde.

Next up, for five minutes, is Mr. Baylis.

10:20 a.m.

Liberal

Frank Baylis Liberal Pierrefonds—Dollard, QC

Thank you.

I'm going to follow up on the point my colleague just raised here. He received a text just now refuting what you said. Specifically, the U.K. Information Commissioner, Elizabeth Denham, says that AIQ refused to answer her specific questions relating to data usage during the referendum campaign. It's to the point that the U.K. is considering taking further legal action to secure the information she needs.

This is in real time. It just happened based on what you said.

Who's not telling us the truth, you or her? It's a straight question now. Who's not telling us the truth?

You just led us to believe that you got two letters and answered them fully. She's saying that is not the case, to the point that they're looking at taking legal action.

10:25 a.m.

Chief Operating Officer, AggregateIQ

Jeff Silvester

If she has additional questions, I'm hopeful that she'll follow up with us.

10:25 a.m.

Liberal

Frank Baylis Liberal Pierrefonds—Dollard, QC

She does not say that. She said that you refused to answer, so she doesn't have additional ones; she has the same ones that you refused to answer.

Is she not telling us the truth, or are you, Mr. Silvester, not telling us the truth?

10:25 a.m.

Chief Operating Officer, AggregateIQ

Jeff Silvester

I've told you exactly what we have done, and I can only speak to—

10:25 a.m.

Liberal

Frank Baylis Liberal Pierrefonds—Dollard, QC

I'm asking you a straightforward question. This is directly refuted. Who's not telling us the truth here?

10:25 a.m.

Chief Operating Officer, AggregateIQ

Jeff Silvester

I've been 100% honest in all of my answers.

10:25 a.m.

Liberal

Frank Baylis Liberal Pierrefonds—Dollard, QC

I will repeat it.

She is happy to say that AIQ has refused to answer her specific questions.

You've just said again that you did answer them all. Did you answer them?

10:25 a.m.

Chief Operating Officer, AggregateIQ

Jeff Silvester

We have provided answers to all of the questions she provided and have offered to provide any clarification, in our letters to her.

10:25 a.m.

Liberal

Frank Baylis Liberal Pierrefonds—Dollard, QC

Explain to me how we got this information in real time, then.

10:25 a.m.

Chief Operating Officer, AggregateIQ

Jeff Silvester

I expect—