Yes. I also will answer in English,
just so I can be precise.
I think that one of the major things is in addition to what Professor Pal has just put forward about the permanent campaign and where third parties are actually regulated. In addition to advertising and spending, we have questions about data collection itself. It's not just using the data to go and do the targeting, but it's collecting the data in the first place. We see a lot of this happening outside of the election period.
You mentioned Ontario Proud. They registered as an established third party but they weren't an established third party for a large chunk of their lifespan when they were collecting users on Facebook and updating their mailing lists and their text messaging list. That's all reasonable for a private entity or a non-profit organization, or whatever, to want to build up a contact list. But when they're doing that and then using it for very clear and explicit political purposes, that starts to raise questions about our ability to actually know whether or not the people who are in their database and then being sent political content and advertisements want to be there, whether or not the information is reliable, and whether or not the citizens would want to have their data removed. There's no real way that citizens are empowered to take ownership of their data.