Thank you.
I also haven't read the details of USMCA yet, but I think the questions that are brought up are important and we need to look into them.
To build off what Ms. Bradshaw just said, I would say that the idea of platforms being responsible for all of the content that shows up on them has been a major question. As she said, it has been a really valuable tool for the growth of these companies and for innovation in how we deal with the mountains of data and information that now exist, and that's helpful. However, I think that there's an important distinction to be made between allowing content to exist and being responsible for that content, and being responsible for what content shows up as trending topics, recommended search results or something that is at the top of people's newsfeeds.
There are decisions that these platforms make already about what gets the light of day and what doesn't, and those decisions need to be considered in terms of whether or not they are silencing groups that shouldn't be silenced or promoting racist or hateful content that shouldn't be promoted and put forward.
Without having looked at USMCA, I can't tell whether or not that distinction between content and the dissemination of content has been addressed, or the implications, but I think it's an important thing to look at.