Potentially, then, it's a practical problem for us to solve, but in theory there's not necessarily an objection.
The last thing is just on regulating speech. The right to be forgotten, potential privacy towards defamation, harassment, hate.... There are reasons for material to be taken down.
Do you have a preferred model of how this information should be taken down? If Google doesn't want to be the police, who should be? Should Google pay into a fund to have a public body administering and making these decisions? Do you have a view as to how this should work?