I have one more question, and then I would like to get Mr. Bennett's thoughts on the same thing.
With regard to procedural fairness, we have four jurisdictions that have the order-making model, and we have Newfoundland, which has the hybrid model. Would there not be the same procedural fairness concerns?
I can imagine a case in which I bring a complaint to the hybrid model in Newfoundland, and they disagree with me. I want to take that to court, so I have to have been dealt with in a procedurally fair manner by the hybrid model at the first instance. Why is it different when we look at procedural fairness in the hybrid model and in the order-making models?