Evidence of meeting #28 for Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was pipeda.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Hugues La Rue
Michael Dewing  Committee Researcher

11:35 a.m.

NDP

Daniel Blaikie NDP Elmwood—Transcona, MB

It just doesn't exist.

11:35 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Blaine Calkins

I don't know of any complaints. Mr. Blaikie used the word “remedy”. Remedy usually suggests that there is a problem. I don't know if there is a problem, but there are people suggesting that there might be a problem and there might need to be a remedy.

Mr. Blaikie has rightly pointed out that, whether that falls under the Privacy Act, PIPEDA, or the Elections Act, we could.... His study is proposing we take a look at whether there are concerns and how they should be dealt with.

11:35 a.m.

NDP

Daniel Blaikie NDP Elmwood—Transcona, MB

For instance, if you are dealing with a government entity, you have a right to know what information they keep about you, and you have a right to request that incorrect information be corrected. You have no such right with a political party. They have no legal obligation to furnish you with the information they keep about you, and you have no right to have incorrect information changed.

11:35 a.m.

Liberal

Bob Bratina Liberal Hamilton East—Stoney Creek, ON

Can't we capture that in the studies we are doing?

11:35 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Blaine Calkins

That's the debate we are having. It might well come up under PIPEDA, as well. It might be during our report. Because we did hear about it in the Privacy Act, it may come up as a recommendation even with the Privacy Act. We don't know how this is going to work out. We are simply entertaining the notion of having a study about this one particular issue at this particular point in time.

We are back to the main motion, as amended. Does anybody else wish to speak to it?

(Motion as amended agreed to)

We now have a third study topic.

Mr. Jeneroux, go ahead.

11:40 a.m.

Conservative

Matt Jeneroux Conservative Edmonton Riverbend, AB

Could we get a recorded vote on that? We can do that, can't we?

11:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Blaine Calkins

Usually we need to be a little quicker off the hop on that.

11:40 a.m.

Conservative

Matt Jeneroux Conservative Edmonton Riverbend, AB

I could tell you, if you want.

11:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Blaine Calkins

It's already done.

We haven't done a recorded vote yet.

October 18th, 2016 / 11:40 a.m.

The Clerk

I'm not sure we can.

11:40 a.m.

Conservative

Matt Jeneroux Conservative Edmonton Riverbend, AB

I withdraw my request to have a recorded vote.

In the future, what's the process? Do we request it before?

11:40 a.m.

NDP

Daniel Blaikie NDP Elmwood—Transcona, MB

Request it before.

11:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Blaine Calkins

Yes. As soon as I call “All those in favour”, just speak up and say, “I request a recorded vote.”

11:40 a.m.

Conservative

Matt Jeneroux Conservative Edmonton Riverbend, AB

Fair enough.

11:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Blaine Calkins

Should we do it just for fun?

11:40 a.m.

NDP

Daniel Blaikie NDP Elmwood—Transcona, MB

Sure. It would be good practice.

11:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Blaine Calkins

We've already dealt with it. In the future, we'll know. It's not fair to members to do that at this particular point in time.

Unless there are any other items, I think that concludes our business for today. I got you out of here in just about an hour. Enjoy the rest of the day. We'll see you here with our witnesses on Thursday.

Thank you very much.