Okay. I guess that's just what I'm trying to get at. In our review of this legislation, we've had other witnesses say SCISA was a solution looking for a problem, as it were. I'm trying to understand better what the problems were in information sharing. What kind of information wasn't able to be shared under existing authorities, such that SCISA is representing an improvement?
I don't want you to prejudge the outcome of your reports in terms of whether SCISA's working or not, but can you give a concrete example of a type of case—not a particular case—where attempts at information sharing were frustrated, and the security purposes of the agencies that you review were being hindered because they didn't have adequate authority under the previous regime prior to SCISA?
