If I understand your question, it's simply a matter of the best practice. If we're looking at an RCMP file and we discover that some erroneous information has been provided to another agency, we'd certainly expect that information to be corrected. We have the authority to make recommendations to the RCMP.
It's a difficult scenario without knowing the specific context, but we have the ability to make recommendations. I would hope that the RCMP would have corrected this on their own initially. They certainly would be able to go after the information, pull it back, and make the corrections. If we did a review of a file and found that they didn't do that, we would certainly have the authority then to make the same recommendations.