I can jump in after that. It's a very easy answer. The answer is, of course, yes, but our constitutional rights are framed this way: we have a right to be protected against unreasonable search and seizure, and that means that post hoc figuring it out is not the way to do it. The question is not, “Does security ever trump privacy?” Of course it does. The question is, does SCISA provide us with the constitutional protection that we require to be protected against what is unreasonable—not what is justifiable and reasonable, but what is unreasonable? That, I think, is the heart of the SCISA question.
