I'll echo what we've been saying, but maybe I'll take a different tack. I think National Defence, Foreign Affairs, or Global Affairs Canada, all had authority to disclose information, which means sharing information. All of those authorities would not necessarily be clear to each other in terms of the security intelligence community, or even beyond that, in terms of understanding each other's disclosure.
I'll use FINTRAC as an example. They are explicitly allowed in their legislation to be able to disclose information. It's very clear in that legislation. It's perhaps not so clear in terms of understanding the crown prerogative that Mr. Burt brought up in his opening remarks. SCISA provides a better framework, I think, to be able to understand each other's mandates and provide a mechanism whereby the sharing of information with the 17 recipient identified entities would be clearer.
That's the way I would couch it.