I'll answer, and then André will jump in.
We think the European model is very burdensome. It in fact puts the responsibility onto the organizations to decide who stays on and who comes off. In our view generally, people who are putting information out there are generally doing it through the proliferation of smart devices whereby they're putting information out. All through that process with smart devices there are checks and balances, even on the device.
You can have a check and balance in whether you want to have an application on your device and whether you want that application to follow you; you can decide whether you want any emails from that organization at all, and although you don't read them all, you do have to agree to the terms and conditions of anything you buy on the site.
You are thus making a conscious decision every time you progress on the device, and the organizations have put that in place because frankly, for any organization these days, the reputational risk of doing something for an individual and having it go out into hyper space—of doing something wrong—is just not worth it. They are taking care of it and are quite willing to work with the Privacy Commissioner to keep up with modern organizations.
André, do you have anything to add?