Yes, that's correct. We have several very large bodies, such as the university and so on, that have a small office with dedicated staff, and other large-bodied bodies, such as government departments, that are double- and sometimes triple-hatted. That filters down to the smaller groups as well, in which you may have someone there just part time, such as in a municipality.
But I think something that has to be stressed here is that it's not the ATIP coordinator who has the authority to release or authorize the release of the information. It's the head of the public body. I would strongly support the ATIP coordinators being in the position of authority—at the director, executive director, even the assistant deputy minister level—at which they can have the ear of the head and be able to speak, I suppose, more frankly. When you have to work through the bureaucracy, there is only so much that the ATIP coordinators can do.
We've seen over the years a significant amount of frustration when the recommendation is made, but it's up to the head to make the decision.
Sean, is there anything you can add to that?