Yes, but you're mixing up two provisions.
Section 11 has “reasonably seen to have been given” and is specific to section 11, so if we're trying to interpret section 6 or 9, or whatever we're trying to interpret, that doesn't use that expression.
On August 11th, 2020. See this statement in context.
As an Individual
Yes, but you're mixing up two provisions.
Section 11 has “reasonably seen to have been given” and is specific to section 11, so if we're trying to interpret section 6 or 9, or whatever we're trying to interpret, that doesn't use that expression.
See context to find out what was said next.