Yes, but you're mixing up two provisions.
Section 11 has “reasonably seen to have been given” and is specific to section 11, so if we're trying to interpret section 6 or 9, or whatever we're trying to interpret, that doesn't use that expression.
On August 11th, 2020. See this statement in context.
August 11th, 2020 / 5:15 p.m.
As an Individual
Yes, but you're mixing up two provisions.
Section 11 has “reasonably seen to have been given” and is specific to section 11, so if we're trying to interpret section 6 or 9, or whatever we're trying to interpret, that doesn't use that expression.
See context to find out what was said next.