Thank you, Chair.
To my colleague, Mr. Angus, I am not trying to obstruct the process. I'm just purely trying to get some clarification because it seems to me that every time I raise my hand to speak, that's the label I get.
I have some questions similar to those Madame Shanahan asked. Listening to your explanation, I get it. It's on record. The question is this: Who's going to make that judgment on whether or not they're trade secrets? Are we allowing the witness to make that judgment for parts that would be for MPs' eyes only and others are more a general pile of evidence? I want to make sure, because it's not covered in this motion. As well, there is no specific time frame. I see that it has to do with the WE organization. I want to make sure of that. There's no specific time frame.
I'm okay with it. I'm just raising with my colleagues whether that needs to be considered. Judging from what the chair was saying, we're giving that judgment power to the presenter or the witness to make a determination on what documents fall under trade secrets and which are for MPs' eyes only, no electronic devices, the same parameters we set to protect those documents in our previous or larger motion. I want to clarify that and make sure of that.