We had a specific motion around Mr. Perelmuter's documents, which listed out a bunch of things. Generally when we request documents, we would guard any trade secrets exactly the same as we did with Mr. Perelmuter's.
Clerk, please correct me if I'm not right.
As Mr. Angus has just said, anything that pertains to the management of the WE contract is obviously what members want to have access to and is part of the evidence that they're concerned about. That would be generally the way I would see them manage that. Any trade secrets that would harm the business, we would obviously treat exactly as we treated the documents from Speakers' Spotlight.
In regard to operations, on the specific issue, that would be part of our general evidence.