Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
The first thing about the subamendment is this. Writing to Mr. Shugart to determine when the document he agreed to provide would be forthcoming.... I don't necessarily see that as relevant. We do want that document, period. I think we should just be asking for it.
The second thing is about having Mr. Chin in the original ask. There were three individuals who were asked to come and testify in front of the committee. I would say, Mr. Chair, that there's more than one way to correspond. There may be that one LinkedIn communication that was available, but there are text messages; there are phone calls. I think it's very important that we also hear from the people surrounding Mr. Chin and those people in power who may have had influence in this case. The subamendment here, I don't think really in the spirit of what was originally written, would provide the committee with what we would need to have.