Thank you for that clarification.
I have been asked by media about the term “contempt” and about “contemptuous behaviour” of the government. In this motion, it's not just our committee, as you're aware. It talks about national defence as well and the horrific sexual allegations that seem to have been ignored by the Prime Minister's Office. The Minister of National Defence—right before an election, conveniently—did not want to bring that forward.
Could you please help committee members understand the definitions, as you understand them, of “contempt” and “contempt of Parliament”?