I just want to add a bit more to the context, though, of what we are talking about here.
One of the witnesses is called Ben Chin, and his entire link to the study is one line of correspondence initiated by an executive assistant to Marc Kielburger. It reads as, “Hello Ben, Thank you for your kindness in helping shape our latest program with the gov 't. Warmly, Craig.”
He responded two days after, saying, “Great to hear from you Craig. Let 's get our young working!” The story goes that this was his only interaction with the WE Charity on this specific issue.
Is it fair, because of this one line of communication, to call in a witness for questioning for two hours, in your opinion?