Thank you, Mr. Chair.
A study was already done on this topic in the last Parliament, so I wonder what could be done differently this time. The scope of the motion is so broad that I have difficulty understanding the intent behind it.
The committee's mandate must be kept in mind. There are indeed other important issues to be considered, such as facial recognition technology, as Mr. Fergus and Ms. Khalid were talking about, or the capture of personal information by foreign powers such as China, which is currently using this information against Canadians.
In this context, short of rehashing the past, what would be the point of revisiting a study that has already been done? What else could be added to it? I do not understand the validity of the motion.