I understand.
Basically, you really have nothing much to say about the RCMP's investigation because, of course, you would have no personal knowledge of it. I also understand that the committee, the clerk and the chair properly invited you, but I also don't quite understand why you're here.
However, while you are here, can I ask another question that I've been curious about? I believe this was before you came to the justice committee, so you would perhaps have been involved. When the Privy Council Office originally determined whether or not there would be a waiver of cabinet confidence to permit Ms. Wilson-Raybould to testify, was that the largest waiver of cabinet confidence ever when she was permitted to divulge matters to the justice committee? Would others be within a certain scope?