Yes, I think I would agree with that. Particularly, we've seen so many examples of emerging technologies, both facial recognition and other types of algorithmic policing technologies, where we as a society and human rights would really have benefited from a precautionary approach and not the infamous “move fast and break things” approach.
I do agree, though, with Ms. Piovesan, who talked about taking a more granular approach, a scalpel rather than an axe, but you're right. We do need time to figure out specifically what the contents of that approach are.
If being cautious and preventing harm means putting a stop to the use of this technology while we figure it out, it would be fair to say that's a sound approach.