That's right.
It's so refreshing to see such passion in the House in the matter of debate.
If members are really serious about wanting to find out about this.... Maybe they don't want to find out what Mr. Anderson has to say under oath. That's another interesting question to explore. Maybe they have their doubts as to what Mr. Anderson will provide by way of evidence, or they don't want to hear what Mr. Anderson has to say under oath and they simply are trying to delay that privilege motion indefinitely.
I'm just speculating here, Mr. Chair.
I certainly have my doubts as to the sincerity of some of my colleagues. I hate to say that, because I'd like to believe that every member of Parliament is here to get to the truth of matters and to work on behalf of Canadians. It's just possible that in this case there are some partisan games going on. I hate to go there, but there you have it.