That would be very much appreciated.
I want to ask a question. In the examples that have come about today, I guess the most “benign” use of FRT, if that's the word for it, or one of the more benign uses spoken of, is the one that many of us are familiar with. That's the facial recognition to unlock an iPhone or a mobile device. An individual has consented to this use and has supplied a photo of themselves for their convenience and for the biometric security around their own phone. On a personal level, I find a fingerprint much more convenient and easier, if the device will allow that, than a photo, and more reliable.
If this is one for which there seems be, on this panel or around the table, one of the more easily supported uses of this, are there problems, even at that level, of where a consumer is readily, or at least relatively readily, consenting to this type of use?
I'll maybe ask each of our panellists to weigh in on this for a quick moment. Would this be an acceptable use of FRT? Would this be included in the moratoriums that some are asking for?
Let me start with you, Dr. Watkins, just for a quick answer.